Alarm Lock 700
Posted in Uncategorized on 11/20/2005 05:25 am by admin
alarm lock 700
![]() |
![]() ALARM CONTROLS 600LB ACONTROL 700LBS MAG LOCK W US $184.00
|
![]() 84 Honda Sabre VF 700 VF700 S V45 gas cap key alarm lock set US $85.00
|
Custodial Death
INTRODUCTION[1]
The word custody implies guardianship and protective care. Even when applied to indicate arrest or incarceration, it does not carry any sinister symptoms of violence during custody. No civilized law postulates custodial cruelty – an inhuman trait that springs out of a perverse desire to cause suffering when there is no possibility of any retaliation; a senseless exhibition of superiority and physical power over the one who is overpowered or a collective wrath of hypocritical thinking. It is one of the worst crime in the civilized society, governed by the rule of law and poses a serious threat to an orderly civilized society. Torture in custody flouts the basic rights of the citizens and is an affront to human dignity.
Prisoners have human rights and prison torture is the confession of the failure to do justice to living man. For a prisoner, all fundamental rights are an enforceable reality, though restricted by the fact of imprisonment. Simply stated, the death of a person in custody whether of the Police or Judicial will amount to Custodial Death. No doubt, the police plays vital role in safeguarding our life, liberty and freedoms. But the police must act properly, showing fall respect to the human rights of the people, remembering that they are also beneath the law, not above it and can be held liable for the violation of human rights. One can always argue that prisons formed islands of lawless discretion in a society guided by the values and often the practice of the rule of law, where the authorities exercised arbitrary power over the prisoner's lives. The charge of brutal custodial violence by the police often resulting in the death of the arrestees is not new. The figures of Amnesty International in 1992 show the number of deaths in police custody in India during the year 1985 to 1991 was 415. Figures compiled by the National Crime Records Bureau show that during the year 1990-92, as many as 258 rapes and 197 deaths in police custody were reported from all over the country. Needless to say, a large number of custodial violence incidents go unreported. Arun Shourie once observed: The victims were invariably poor. Several of them hauled in on no formal charges at all. Even in the case of persons who were arrested, in an overwhelmingly large number of cases they were all accused of petty offences n fact, the victims of custodial violence are people from poor and backward sections of the society with little political or financial power to back them. Personal enmity, caste and political considerations and at times pecuniary benefits become important considerations for custodial deaths rather than investigation of cases.
Conceptual aspect regarding custodial death
Law has always discouraged the acts or omissions which in general can affect right in rem and violators have always been punished with strict sanctions but the crime rate is not falling and State is in regular quest to preserve social solidarity and peace in society. Whenever death occurs in custody, it raises the public interest and attracts media attention. Not that at each time the death is due to violent causes but at times may be due to natural causes or due to inadequate medical facilities or medical attention and diagnosis, or negligent behavior of authorities or may be due to physical abuse and torture. Since time immemorial man has been attempting to subjugate his fellow human beings. Those in power are used to twisting and turning the people through violence and torture, and torture under custody has become a global phenomenon. Men, women and even children are subjected to torture in many of the world's countries,even though in most of these countries, the use of torture is prohibited by law and by the international declarations signed by their respective representatives. A problem of increasing occurrence and repugnance had been the methods of interrogation and torture perpetrated upon prisoners and detainees. Persons held in custody, by police or by prison authorities, retain their basic constitutional right except for their right to liberty and a qualified right to privacy. The Magistrate inquest is mandatory for any death of a person in custody to ensure examination of the circumstances leading to death. Beyond Magistrate's inquest and in recent year's information to Human Right Commission, however, there is no formal public scrutiny of in-prison deaths and under such situations many avoidable factors leading to death remains unexplored.
Constitution provision regarding custodial death
In thepost-Maneka era, in a cantena of cases, the Supreme Court has exposed the cruelty of the system of Prison Administration in India and has sought to humanize it. The Court has taken an active interest in seeking to improve a system which is cruel and insensitive to human pain and suffering. Time and again , the Supreme court has emphasized that Art 14, 19 and 21 " are available to prisoners as well as freeman. andPrisoners wall do not keep out fundamental Right"Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the right of personal liberty and thereby prohibits any inhuman, cruel or degrading treatment to any person whether he is a national or a foreigner. Any violation of this right attracts Article 14, which enshrines right to equality and equal protection of laws. Such rights are discussed in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as well. The Constitution recognizes it to be fundamental in the governance of the country that the State shall direct its policy to secure conditions of freedom and dignity and insulates against all forms of tyranny against mind and body and their freedom to grow fearlessly. All custodial safeguards in the constitutional and other laws are meant to protect human dignity and shun barbaric approaches. This is why no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himselfArt.20(3), a person is entitled to know why he is arrested for being detained in custody and to consult a legal practitioner of his choice . The right to live with human dignity enshrined in Art. 21 derives its life and breath from the directive principles of State policy particularly clauses (e) and (f) of Article 39 and Articles 41 and 42 as held by the Supreme Court in Bandhua Mukti Morcha case. Art. 142 empower the Supreme Court to ‘make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it. The power of the Supreme Court under this provision is meant to supplement the existing legal framework in order to do complete justice between the parties and not to supplant it. It is intended to prevent any obstruction in the stream of justice . The innovations made by the Supreme Court is not only reducing the multiplicity of litigation but also helping the courts to render speedy justice to victims of the infringement of right to life and personal liberty. In Nilabati Behera vs.State of Orissa, where, the Supreme Court awarded damages against the state to the mother of a young man beaten to death in police custody. In tune with the constitutional guarantee a number of statutory provisions also seek to protect personal liberty, dignity and basic human rights of the citizens. Chapter V of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 deals with the powers of arrest of a person and the safeguards which are required to be followed by the police to protect the interest of the arrested person. Section 41, Cr. PC, confers powers on and police officer to arrest a person under the circumstances specified therein without any order or a warrant of arrest from a Magistrate. Section 46 provides the method and manner of arrest. Under this section no formality is necessary while arresting a person. Under Section 49, the police is not permitted to use more restraint than is necessary to prevent the escape of the person. Section 50 enjoins every police officer arresting any person without warrant to communicate to him the full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested and the grounds for such arrest .The police officer is further enjoined to inform the person arrested that he is entitled to be released on bail and he may arrange for sureties in the went of his arrest for a non-bailable offend. Section 56 contains a mandatory provision requiring the police officer making an arrest without warrant to produce the arrested person before a Magistrate without unnecessary delay and Section 57 echoes clause (2) of Article 22 of the Constitution of India. There are some provisions also like Sections 53, 54 and 167 which are aimed at affording procedural safeguards to a person arrested by the police. In Francis Corallie Mullin v.Union Territory of Delhi, the Supreme court has condemned cruelty or torture as being violative of art 21 in following words " any form of torture and cruelty or degrading treatment would be offensive of human dignity and it would on its view , be prohibited by article 21. It would be seen that there is implicit in article 21 the right to protection against torture or cruel, inhuman which is enunciated in Article 5 of Universal Declaration of Human right and guaranteed by Article 7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights".
Police atrocities: some concern
Custodial violence, including torture and death in the lock-ups, are committed under the shields of "uniform" and "authority" between the four walls of a police station, lock-up and prison, where the victims are totally helpless The custodial deaths are neither usual nor unknown. Such deaths take place not only in India but also in various other countries. These deaths definitely lead to custodial violence. Experience shows that worst violations of human rights take place during the course of investigation, when the police with a view to secure evidence of confession often resort to third degree methods including torture and adopts techniques of screening arrest by either not recording the arrest or describing the deprivation of liberty merely as a prolonged interrogation. A reading of the newspaper almost everyday carrying reports dehumanizing torture assault, rape and death in custody of police or other governmental agencies is indeed depressing. The increasing incidence of torture and death in custody has assumed such alarming proportions that it is affecting the credibility of the Rule of Law and the administration of criminal justice system. The community rightly feels perturbed. Society's cry for justice becomes louder. In State of Maharashtr v. Ravi Kanth S. Patit,° held, that handcuffing and parading of an under-trial prisoner was violative of Article 21 of the Constitution. The State and not the police was asked to pay compensation to the victim. Although torture is not expressly countermanded by the Constitution, Article 21 clearly provides protecting against it.
The arrest of a person suspected of crime does not warrant any physical violence on the person or his torture. But, when the captive exercises his fundamental right to silence against self-incrimination, Art. 20(3) .During his interrogation, the police often abuse their authority by use of criminal force to extort information. Sections 330 and 331 of the Indian Penal Codeprovide for punishment to one who voluntarily caused hurt or grievous hurt to extort the confession or any information which may lead to detection of an offence or misconduct. The ambit of these sections is wide enough as to extend to all policemen then present, but, who do nothing to prevent torture and either stand unconcerned or withdraw from the scene for fear of getting themselves implicated therein. Such observation came to be seen in Sham Kants' case,wherein it was held that "the learned trial Judge was quite wrong when he did not hold accused No.1 (ASI) guilty of abetment only on the ground that although he was present, he had not actively participated in beating the suspect."The Third Report of the National Police Commission in India expressed its deep concern with custodial violence and lock-up deaths. It appreciated the demoralising effect which custodial torture was creating on the society as a whole it made some very useful suggestions. It suggested¬
An arrest during the investigation of a cognizable case may be considered justified in one or other of the following the Circumstances.
The expression "life or personal liberty" in Article 21 includes a guarantee against torture and assault even by the State and its functionaries to a person who is taken in custody and no sovereign immunity can be pleaded against the liability of the State arising due to such criminal use of force over the captive person. The right to interrogate the detenus, culprits or arrestees in the interest of the nation, must take precedence over an individual's right to personal liberty. The Latin maxim salus populi est suprema lex (the safety of the people is the supreme law) and salus republicae est suprema lex (safety of the State is the Supreme law) co-exist and are not only important and relevant but lie at the heart of the doctrine that the welfare of an individual must yield to that of the community. The action of the State, however, must be "right, just and fair". As held by the Supreme Court in a case that "custodial torture" is a naked violation of human dignity and a degradation which destroys, to a very large extent human personality. Here the SC had prohibited the use of third degree methods on suspects and framed various guidelines for protecting their human rights.
Custodial death: Violative of human right Judicial conscience recognized human rights of prisoners because of its reformist approach and the belief that convicts is also human beings and that the purpose of imprisonment is to reform them rather than to make them hardened criminals. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, adopted and proclaimed by the General Assembly Resolution 217A(III) of 10th December, 1948 declared in the preamble that recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. The expression-"Human Rights" has not been specifically defined in any Declaration or Covenant of the United Nations.- Human Rights are generally defined as "those rights which are inherent in our nature and without which we cannot live as human beings" recognition of these natural rights of human beings is as ancient as the human civilization. . India was one of the signatories of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and acceded to the two International Covenants by depositing the Instrument of Accession of April 10, 1979. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action adopted on June 25, 1993, by the World Conference on Human Rights declared that "Human Rights and fundamental freedom are the birth right of all human beings". The Human Rights are now recognized as the limits to the exercise of power by the State over individuals.
The Apex Court's Concern
These requirements ensure, the record of the police personnel arresting and handling the arrestee, the record of arrest, the record of his whereabouts during detention, giving of information to his relative or acquaintance having interest in his welfare, periodic medical examination of the arrestee to ascertain whether any force is used and the state of his health which in custody, preparation of "Inspection memo" recording injuries if any on the arrestee so that the events of custodial violence can be easily detected and the perpetrations are duly dealt with. These requirements which flow from Art. 21 and 22(1) of the Constitution are ordered to be strictly followed not only by the Police agencies but also by the other governmental agencies. The Apex Court through judicial activism evolved a right to compensation in cases of established unconstitutional deprivation of personal liberty or life.The ‘Bhagalpur blinding case was the first case where the question of monetary compensation was considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.In Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa it was held," Adverting to the grant of relief to the heirs of victim of custodial death for the infraction or invasion of rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it is not always enough to relegate him to the ordinary remedy of in civil suit to claim damages for the tortuous act of the State ,is that remedy in private law indeed is available to the aggrieved party". The citizen complaining of the infringement of the indefeasible right under Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be told that for the established violation of the fundamental right to life, he cannot get any relief under the public law by the Courts exercising writ jurisdiction. The primary source of the public law proceedings stems from the prerogative writ and the Courts have, therefore, to evolve 'new tools' to give relief in public law by moulding it according to the situation with a view to preserve and protect the Rule of Law. Here the Supreme Court awarded damages against the State to the mother of a young man beaten to death in police custody. The Court held that its power of enforcement imposed a duty to 'forge new tools', of which compensation was an appropriate one where that was the only mode of redress available. It was said that if death in police custody the deceased is entitled for monetary compensation under article 32 and 226 of constitution of India. This was not a remedy in tort, but one in public law based on strict liability for the contravention of fundamental rights to which the principle of sovereign immunity does not apply. The apex court in Sebastian M Hongrey v. Union of India where Supreme Court by a writ to herbs corpus required the Government of India to produce two persons and Government eventually failed to produce them expressing its inability to do so and the assertion of the Government that the person left certain camp near which a certain army regiment was stationed alive was untenable and incorrect, the Government would be guilty of civil contempt because of the willful disobedience to the writ. The Apex Court keeping in view the torture, agony and mental oppression of the family members of such persons, directed payment of cost of Rs. 1 lakh each.In (SmtJ Nilabati Behrn @ Lalita Bahera v. State of Orissa , the Apex Court held that violation of human rights by the State should be compensated and writ of compensation is maintainable. It further held that sovereign immunity is not applicable in case of violation of fundamental rights. In a decision of the Supreme Court in People's Union for Liberties v. Union of India hich was u case from Manipur, a disturbed area, in which case there was a fake encounter and two persons alleged to be terrorist- were seized by police, taken to a distant place and shot at causing their death it was held that such administrative liquidation cannot be permitted and interference of the Court is called for. The Apex Court awarded a compensation of rupees 1 lakh to families of each of the deceased. The apex court in Raghubir Singh v. State of Haryanaheld that the society was deeply disturbed by the diabolical recurrence of police torture resulting in a terrible scare in the minds of common citizens that their lives and liberty are under a new peril, when the guardians of law gore human rights, to death. This development is disastrous our human right awareness and humanistic constitutional order
Human Rights Commission – A silver lining
The official machinery for the protection of human rights in this country was set in motion by the then President's assent to the Protection of Human Rights Act came in to force on September 28,1993. Section 3 of the Act provides for the setting up of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and Section 21 for the setting up of the various State Commissions (SHRC). The National Human Rights Commission in its Annual Report of 1997-98 records that during the year 1996-97, 188 deaths in Police Custody were reported and during the year 1997-98, 193 deaths in Police Custody, and 700 deaths and 819 deaths respectively in judicial custody were reported to the Commission. In the context of addressing the issue of custodial torture, the Commission has reiterated its earlier recommendations by soliciting early action on the suggestion of the Indian Law Commission to the effect that proposed Section 114(B) be inserted in the Indian Evidence Act to introduce a rebuttable presumption that injuries sustained by a person in police custody may be presumed to have been caused by a Police Officer, as well as the suggestion for amendment in Sec. 197 of the Cr. P.C. to obviate the necessity for governmental sanction for the prosecution of a police officer where a prima-facie case has been established in an inquiry conducted by a Sessions judge in the commission of a custodial offence, as also the suggestion by the National Police Commission that there should be a mandatory inquiry by a Sessions Judge in each case of custodial death, rape or grievous hurt.
The law commission recommended in its 113th Report that in prosecution of a police officer for an alleged offence of having caused bodily injury to a person, if there was evidence that the injury was caused during the period when the person was in the custody of the police officer, the court may presume that the injury was caused by the police officer having the custody of that person during that period. In Shyamsunder Trivedi's case the Supreme Court also expressed that hope that the government and legislature would give serious thought to the recommendation of law commission. Unfortunately, the suggested amendment has not been incorporated in the statute so far. The need of amendment requires no emphasis, sharp rise in custodial violence, torture and death in custody, justifies the urgency for the amendment and the court invites Parliament attention to it.
Conclusion-
The cases that come to light reflect the cruelty with which the human beings brought in custody or control are treated by their fellow human beings. Such cruel demeanors of human beings would put to shame even wild carnivorous beasts and terrify and benumb tigers witnessing the skinning of a mighty tigress in the helpless custody of her captors supposed to protect and preserve the specie.Detection and deterrence would be the key factors for preventing the recurrence of such incidents.An efficient and independent machinery to detect such cases and prompt action to punish the erring officials can ensure some safety against custodial violence. Section 37 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 empowers the Government to constitute one or more special investigative teams consisting of such police officers as it thinks necessary for the purpose of investigation and prosecution of offences arising out of violations of human rights .The renaissance of the doctrine of natural rights in the form of human rights across the globe is a great development in the jurisprudential field in the contemporary
[1] Sonakshi Verma,B.A LL.B, 3nd year ,Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University
About the Author
student
|
|
Xena XX-6 Alarm Lock $79.95 Xena XX-6 Alarm Lock. |
|
|
XA201 Zone Alarm Lock $44.99 Xena XA201 Zone Alarm Lock Wall mounted Infrared beam with 20ft. range Ultra loud 130db alarm Code activated with remote key fob |
|
|
XA601 Zone Alarm Lock $44.99 Xena XA601 Zone Alarm Lock Ceiling mounted 360? degree protection Ultra loud 130 dB alarm Code activated with remote key fob |
|
|
XZZ6L Alarm Disc Lock $68.99 Xena XZZ6L Alarm Disc Lock Easy to use push-down locking 1/4" hardened steel pin 120 db lithium powered alarm Yellow finish hardened steel body |
|
|
XX15 Alarm Lock $98.99 Xena XX15 Alarm Lock High nickel content 304 stainless steel construction 120 db lithium? powered alarm 5/8" Carbide reinforced double locking pin Dimensions 4.13" long x 2.3" high |
|
|
Xena XE15/XN15 Series Alarm Disc Lock $109.95 Xena XE15/XN15 Series Alarm Disc Lock. |
|
|
Xena Alarm Lock XZ Scooter Series $75.95 Xena Alarm Lock XZ Scooter Series. |
|
|
XA801 Zone Alarm Lock $67.99 Xena XA801 Zone Alarm Lock Wall mounted Infrared beam with 20 foot range Easy to program 4 digit code Auto phone dialer for up to 3 pro-grammable phone numbers Ultra loud 110 dB alarm |
|
|
XX-10 Disc Lock With Alarm $89.99 Xena XX-10 Disc Lock with Alarm The high-performance XX10. High nickel-content stainless-steel mono-block construction and piercing 120dB alarm. A remarkably effective way to protect your motorbike. Featuring a sport and streetbike-oriented fit profile with 10mm double-locking, carbide-reinforced hardened-steel locking pin. Shock & motion sensors trigger a piercing 120dB anti-theft alarm powered by a single CR2 Lithium battery. Self-arming, with no on-off switch, re-sets automatically to armed mode within 15 seconds. Includes: 1 XENA Disc-Lock 1 CR2 Battery 3 Keys, 1 Metal Key Code Tag Lock Features: 10mm Carbide-Reinforced Pin 100% Stainless Steel Total Corrosion Resistance Double-Locking System Maximum Security Key & Barrel Ice Spray-Proof Body & Key Barrel Ultra-High Strength Alarm Features: 120dB Alarm Auto Arm/Disarm Shock & Movement Sensors Removable Alarm Module |
|
|
XX-6 Disc Lock with Alarm $71.99 Xena XX-6 Disc?Lock With Alarm High-grade mono-block alloy construction and piercing alarm make the XX6 a remarkably effective way to protect your motorbike or scooter. Lock: Fits virtually any scooter or motorbike, with a high-grade mono-block alloy construction and a 6mm steel pushdown locking pin. Ice-spray proof and pick proof key and barrel. Alarm: Shock & motion sensors linked to a sophisticated microprocessor trigger a 120dB alarm powered by a single CR2 long-life Lithium battery. All electronics are housed in a replaceable alarm module -- no tools required. Self-arming, with no on-off switch, re-sets to armed mode within 15 seconds Features: Ideal for smaller bikes and scooters High-nickel-content stainless steel body Push-down locking system Ice spray-proof and key barrel 1.7 in. (42mm) of throat .24 in. (6mm) diameter hardened steel locking pin Included Items: (1) Disc lock (3) Keys (1) Alarm module removal key |
|
|
XN15 Disc Lock W/Alarm $107.99 Xena XN15 Disc Lock W/Alarm High nickel content 304 stainless steel construction 110 db alarm 5/8" Carbide reinforced double locking pin |
|
|
XX-14 Disc Lock with Alarm $96.99 Xena XX-14 Disc Lock with Alarm An extremely strong lock body and piercing alarm make the high-performance XX14 a remarkably effective way to protect your motorbike.? Lock: High nickel-content stainless-steel mono-block construction with a broad fit profile and 14mm double-locking, carbide-reinforced hardened-steel locking pin. Freeze-spray proof, pick-proof key and barrel.? Alarm: Shock & motion sensors trigger a piercing 120dB anti-theft alarm powered by a single CR2 long-life Lithium battery. Self-arming, with no on-off switch, re-sets to armed mode within 15 secondsNew design with a flared, attack-resistant body shape High nickel-content stainless-steel mono-block construction The shorter, squatter body gives it a sport and streetbike-oriented fit profile Features 1.75" (44mm) of throat with 0.5" (14mm) dia. Carbide-reinforced hardened-steel locking pin Weight: 620g |
|
|
Mini Lock Alarm w/ Bonus Personal Alarm $70 Protect Your Property Dorm life is stressful enough for your child without having to worry about private property being stolen or tampered with. The Mini Lock Alarm is the perfect companion to any laptop computer with a security slot. All you need to do is plug the slot adapter into a notebook computer, set the three-digit security code, and it's fully protected. The alarm will sound if the built-in motion senses movement, or if the cable is cut,. Unlike other alarms, which are only loud enough to serve as a minor annoyance, the Mini Lock Alarm blasts a 100 dB siren; loud enough to send would-be thieves fleeing the scene, and alerting anyone in the area that something is wrong. Also Perfect For Securing: Briefcases Luggage Sporting Goods (Golf Clubs, Skis, etc.) Tools Bicycles, Scooters, Skateboards, etc. Battery Power The Mini Lock Alarm runs on 4 LR44 (1.5v) batteries (included), so you never have to worry about providing external power. The batteries are also housed within the unit, and can only be removed when the device is unlocked, which eliminates the possibility that thieves can tamper with the device and steal your belongings simply by removing the lock's batteries. The Mini Lock Alarm features a low-battery indicator to ensure that you're always aware that it's functioning at its peak performance. Bonus Personal Alarm This package deal includes a personal keychain alarm that packs the same 100 dB punch as the main laptop lock. The pocket-sized alarm screams with the simple press of a button, alerting anyone in earshot that you're in danger; perfect for carrying around a college campus late at night. |
|
|
XTL Trailer Lock W/Alarm $170.99 Xena XTL Trailer Lock w/Alarm Secure trailer couplers of all shapes and sizes Main body is machined from a solid block of 304 stainless steel Chrome Boron steel "U" Shock and motion sensitive 110 dB alarm |
|
|
Lock-On 700 Series Grip $43.99 Throttle tube made of proprietary carbon-fiber compound Throttle grip is molded directly onto throttle tube to create a true no-slip grip No need for grip glue or safety wire due to steel lock-tight band **Closeouts are limited to stock on hand** |
|
|
XN18 Disc Lock W/Alarm $179.99 Xena XN18 Disc Lock W/Alarm 18mm quad locking 18mm carbide reinforced locking pin, 2.6" throat depth Reinforced carbide substructure High nickel content 304 stainless steel construction Ice spray proof body and key barrel 120 db lithium powered alarm Dual shock and movement sensors The Strongest disc lock available |
|
|
Gorilla Grip 3 Steering Wheel Lock with Alarm $65.99 Gorilla Grip 3 Steering Wheel Lock with Alarm; Remote Arm/Disarm; Warning LED; 130dB Siren |
|
|
Screaming Desktop Computer Lock Alarm $80 Secure Your Computer Keep your property where it belongs with the Screaming Desktop Computer Lock Alarm. This tamper-resistant cable lock will emit an ear-splitting 120 dB alarm if tampered with: that?s in the range of emergency vehicle sirens. At that volume, a would-be thief won?t have a chance of going unnoticed. Powered by a 9v Alkaline battery (not included) locked in a tamper proof compartment, there?s no need for outside power. That means you can use this lock virtually anywhere, with little-to-no setup. Mounting is simple; the computer lock alarm?s base unit can be mounted on most surfaces using the included screws, and includes anchors for mounting in brick or concrete. A bracket is also included if you plan on mounting the device to a table or pole. To secure your property: Use the super weld bond adhesive to attach one of the three included cable fixing plates to whatever item you?re concerned about. Run the 8 foot long steel cable through the channels on the fixing plates and insert the steel end of the cable into the base unit. Use one of the 2 included keys to lock the cable in place and activate the alarm. Perfect for school A/V clubs, demonstration booths at expos/conventions, or any place that equipment seems to wander off on its own. The Screaming Computer Lock Alarm is an ideal theft deterrent for anyone who?s worried that their property might be vulnerable. Includes: Lock/Alarm with 8? steel cable (9v battery not included) 2 coded keys 3 cable fixing plates "Super weld bond" adhesive Wall and table mounting brackets Mounting screws & anchors |
|
|
Wireless Door Lock with 90dB Magnet Alarm $23.99 HighlightsWireless Door Lock with 90dB Magnet Alarm Easy installation and usingMagnetic sensor for detecting entryAlarm sound level: 90dBAlarm on/off switchWorking current: lt; 80mAAlarm time: about 15 secondsRed LED alarm indicatorPowered by 3 x LR44 button cells (included)Unit dimension: 116 x 70 x 38mmUnit net weight: 220gSpecificationsThis wireless door lock comes with laud 90dB magnet alarm as an easy solution for home or office security guarding. Its magnet sensor can detect any unwelcome intruder, and it features 90dB loud siren sound to deter thieves and intruders as well as drawing the attention of police or neighbors.This door lock combines a magnetic sensor alarm, this 2-in-1 door lock detects entry, protecting your home or office when you or your children is staying there alone.It is powered by 3 x button cells, no wires, so you should never worry about the electric power shut down problem for this simple home and office security alarm system. Using this simple door lock alarm is very easy, when you get home, lock up the door, then switch on the magnet alarm, when you go out, switching off the alarm, so easy. |
|
|
Streetwise CLA08R Portable Car Lock Alarm with Remote $59.27 The patented design of the SWAT LOCKR not only protects your car with an ear piercing siren it also locks the steering wheel in place to prevent potential car thieves from turning the wheel. It is equipped with four theftdeterrent features: a warning LED a flashing strobe light a120 db siren and a hard steel lock. This alarm locks to the steering wheel in less than 10 seconds no need to run wires or pay for expensive installation. Three keys are included for unlocking the alarm and you can set your own remote control code. When the window is disturbed by tapping or other significant jolt the alarm will sound and a LED light flashes for 30 seconds. If no other disturbance occurs the alarm resets itself. If the disturbance continues the alarm will continue for another 30 seconds until the disturbance ends or the alarm unit is disarmed. The alarm unit requires two (2) 9volt batteries (not included). The IR remote requires 1 12volt battery (included). The alarm measures 14 and onehalf inches by 7 and threequarters. This alarm has a 1 year warranty. |
|
|
Alarm Club Vehicle Anti-theft Lock and Siren $81.02 Protect your car with this anti-theft steering wheel lockSteering wheel lock sounds a 130-decibel alarm when botheredCar interior includes an easy-to-use self-locking feature -- one pull and it locksLED lights for nighttime visibility and protectionAdjustable sensitivity settings Adjustable exit timer to customize Club for your personal vehicle Two-stage alarming sequence to prevent accidentally setting off alarmLow battery light indicatorUniversal fit Works on cars, trucks and SUVsAlarm requires one 9-volt battery (battery not included) |
|
|
HON 700 Series Lateral File With Lock $673.99 0% 1 1 Each 214 lb 4 4 x File 42" Width x 19.25" Depth x 53" Height 700 700 Series Lateral File With Lock 794LS SCS ANSI/BIFMA Lateral file accommodates letter-size or legal-size folders from side-to-side in its fixed front drawers. Design features contemporary full-face integral drawer pulls and reinforced case construction, core-removable locks and reinforced case construction. Mechanical interlock allows only one drawer to open at a time. Lateral file is certified by SCS to be in compliance with specific indoor air quality emission requirements. Meets or exceeds applicable ANSI/BIFMA standards. Charcoal File Cabinet File Storage HON Interlocking Legal Letter Lateral Lifetime Limited No SCS Steel The HON Company Yes www.hon.com |


US $319.00








